Peer Review Week 2025: Rethinking
Peer Review in the AI Era
Did you know that 15–19 September
2025 is international Peer Review Week? This is a time of year to celebrate and
think about the important role that peer review plays in upholding the quality
and integrity of scholarly publication.
The theme of this year’s Peer Review
Week is “Rethinking Peer Review in the AI Era.” The theme invites the research
community to consider the ways that ethical and transparent use of artificial
intelligence tools might enhance, rather than undermine, reviewer integrity and
transparency. It also raises important questions about aspects of peer review
that should remain uniquely human in an age of rapid technological change.
Despite the history of scientific
journals extending back to the publication of the first issue of Philosophical
Transactions in March 1665, modern, double-blind peer review is a
relatively recent development in scholarly publishing. It
wasn’t until 1973 that the flagship scientific journal, Nature,
finally made anonymous refereeing standard practice as we know it today.
Three-hundred-and-sixty years after
the publication of that first scientific journal, the process for determining
the veracity of research articles continues to undergo constant change. The
scholarly publishing industry faces new pressures as the number of new papers
being submitted for consideration is rapidly outpacing the pool of reviewers
available to assess them.
Statistics published by Nature
in 2018 revealed some of the challenges facing the peer review system. The
article indicated that 10% of reviewers were responsible for reviewing 50% of articles,
and that the majority of editors identified finding willing reviewers as the
hardest part of their job. More recently, Nature reported that the
problem is getting even worse.
A variety of solutions have been
proposed to make peer review more sustainable into the future. Suggestions have
ranged from paying
academics to review articles, to using
generative AI to speed up the review process, to scrapping
peer review entirely. For the time being peer review continues to serve as an
important line of defence against bad science, but time will tell if it continues
to be sustainable into the future.
For more information about international
Peer Review Week, head to https://peerreviewweek.net/.
#PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025
Comments